Why Iran Dislikes Israel: Unpacking A Complex Animosity
A Paradoxical Past: From Allies to Enemies
One of the most striking aspects of the Iran-Israel relationship is its dramatic reversal. It might surprise many to learn that **Iran was one of the first Muslim countries to recognize Israel** after its founding in 1948. This historical fact stands in stark contrast to the current hostile dynamic, where **Iran and Israel have been enemies for the past few decades with Iran saying it wants to wipe Israel off the map and threatening to annihilate it.** During the Cold War era, particularly under the Shah's rule, the relationship was largely cordial. **Israel regarded Iran as an ally against the Arab states**, many of whom were hostile to Israel and aligned with the Soviet bloc. This alliance was pragmatic: both nations felt a degree of encirclement by Arab nationalism and found common ground in shared strategic interests. Israel, for its part, sought to build alliances in the non-Arab periphery of the Middle East, and Iran under the Shah offered a powerful partner. It was always Israel that was the proactive party in fostering this relationship, but the Shah also wanted a way to improve Iran's relations with the US, and at the time Israel was seen as a good way to achieve that aim. This mutually beneficial arrangement saw cooperation in various fields, including intelligence and military training. However, even during this period of alliance, subtle shifts began to occur that foreshadowed future tensions. For instance, **Israel, then as now a supporter of the Iraqi Kurds, felt betrayed by this act and lost faith in the Shah as an ally** when Iran made a deal with Iraq in 1975, abandoning the Kurds. This incident, among others, highlighted the underlying complexities and potential for divergence even within an allied framework. Furthermore, **Israel saw Iran’s more conciliatory approach to Arab radicals as potentially shifting the balance of power against Israel**, indicating that Israel always preferred some tension between Iran and the Arabs in order to use them against each other. These subtle fractures, however, were minor compared to the cataclysmic shift that would follow.The 1979 Revolution: A Seismic Shift
The pivotal moment that irrevocably altered the trajectory of Iran-Israel relations was the 1979 Islamic Revolution. This event wasn't merely a change in government; it was a fundamental reordering of Iran's national identity, its foreign policy, and its very perception of the world. **Iran and Israel have had no diplomatic relations since 1979, and modern relations are hostile.** The relationship, which was cordial for most of the Cold War, worsened following the Iranian revolution and has been openly hostile since the end of the Gulf War in 1991. Immediately after the revolution, the new Iranian government under Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini articulated a drastically different worldview. **The Iranian government under Khomeini considered Israel as a colonial outpost that promotes the interest of the West.** This perception was deeply ingrained in the revolutionary ideology, viewing Israel not just as a state, but as an extension of Western imperialism and a symbol of oppression in the Muslim world. Consequently, **Iran then withdrew recognition of Israel as a state, severed all diplomatic and economic ties with the country, called the Israeli government a Zionist regime, and referred to the entire land under Israel as occupied Palestine.** This was a complete and utter repudiation of Israel's legitimacy.The Ideological Foundation: Illegitimacy and the Ummah
At the heart of **why Iran dislikes Israel** lies a profound ideological conviction. **Iran’s Islamists consider Israel an illegitimate state that drove the Palestinians from their homeland.** This isn't merely a political stance; it's a deeply held religious and moral belief. **At least three generations of radical Iranian clerics have viewed Israel as illegitimate, usurping sacred Islamic lands in the name of a pernicious ideology advanced by history’s most devilish and stubborn people.** This sentiment is not just about land; it's about justice, faith, and the very nature of the Islamic world. The concept of the "Ummah," the global Muslim community, plays a crucial role here. **Since Islam views all Muslims as part of the “ummah” (the global Muslim community), this is seen as an attack on Islam requiring a defense of** the Palestinian cause. For the Iranian regime, the Palestinian issue is not just a local conflict but a litmus test for the integrity and strength of the entire Muslim world against perceived Western and Zionist aggression. This religious imperative provides a powerful moral and theological justification for Iran's anti-Israel stance, transcending mere political grievances.Israel as a "Colonial Outpost"
The revolutionary Iranian leadership, particularly under Khomeini, framed Israel as an artificial entity, a product of Western machinations designed to destabilize the region and maintain Western dominance. This narrative casts Israel as a foreign body implanted in the heart of the Muslim world, serving as a proxy for imperialist powers. This perspective is critical to understanding the depth of animosity, as it portrays Israel not just as an adversary, but as an existential threat to the purity and independence of the Islamic world. It's a view that resonates with broader anti-colonial and anti-imperialist sentiments prevalent in the region.Iranian Theocracy and Anti-Western Resistance
Beyond the specific issue of Israel's legitimacy, the Iranian theocracy sees itself as the vanguard of a broader movement. **Iran’s theocratic government perceives itself as the vanguard of Islamic resistance against Western domination and injustice in the Muslim world.** In this grander narrative, Israel is a key component of the Western "domination" project. By opposing Israel, Iran positions itself as the true defender of Islamic values and interests against a perceived global conspiracy led by the United States and its allies. This anti-Western stance is deeply intertwined with Iran's revolutionary identity. The revolution itself was a rejection of the Western-backed Shah and a call for self-determination based on Islamic principles. Therefore, confronting Israel, which is seen as a pillar of Western influence, becomes a fundamental expression of the revolution's enduring spirit and its commitment to challenging the existing world order. This explains, for instance, why the Iranian leadership might be reluctant to make a deal with the Americans, even if it could lessen tensions. For them, promoting the "essential nature of the revolution" and challenging the "world order" often involves confronting perceived adversaries like Israel and the US, rather than seeking rapprochement.Regional Hegemony and the Unifying Enemy
While ideology is a powerful driver, geopolitical ambition also plays a significant role in **why Iran dislikes Israel**. **Iran’s fundamental challenge lies in its desire for regional hegemony.** To rule effectively across the Middle East, unity around shared principles—including a common enemy—is often a potent tool. Israel, as a long-standing and highly visible adversary, serves perfectly as this "unifying enemy." By rallying various groups and nations against Israel, Iran seeks to expand its influence and leadership across the Muslim world, particularly among Shiite communities and those sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. This strategy allows Iran to project power far beyond its borders, establishing a network of alliances and proxies that challenge the traditional regional order dominated by Sunni Arab states and their Western partners. For an unpopular, unsuccessful, and in many ways inept regime, this strategy is the one thing that continues to deliver results, giving it leverage and legitimacy among certain segments of the population in the region.The Strategy of Proxy Warfare
The intense animosity between Iran and Israel rarely manifests in direct, conventional warfare. Instead, it plays out primarily through a complex web of proxy conflicts. **Iran’s long war by proxy against Israel and the regional order remains in motion.** This strategy is highly effective for Iran, allowing it to exert pressure on Israel and its allies without risking a direct, devastating confrontation with a militarily superior foe. Iran supports various non-state actors, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza, and various Shiite militias in Syria and Iraq. These groups receive financial, military, and logistical support from Tehran, enabling them to launch attacks or maintain a state of tension along Israel's borders. This asymmetric warfare is a key component of Iran's overall strategy to weaken Israel and challenge its security.The "Slow Bleeding" Strategy
A key aspect of Iran's proxy warfare is what might be termed a "slow bleeding" strategy. **Iran’s preference, clearly, is to now return to the slow bleeding of Israel using dispensable, allied Islamist organizations.** This approach aims to inflict continuous, low-level attrition on Israel, both militarily and psychologically, without triggering a full-scale war. It keeps Israel on edge, drains its resources, and aims to erode its sense of security and stability over time. This strategy also serves to maintain the narrative of resistance and keep the Palestinian issue at the forefront of regional consciousness, aligning with Iran's ideological goals.Israel's Perspective and Concerns
From Israel's vantage point, Iran's hostility is an existential threat. **Israel, for its part, regards Iran as its biggest** strategic challenge. Iran's nuclear program, its development of long-range missiles, and its extensive network of proxies surrounding Israel are all viewed with extreme alarm. Iran's repeated threats to "wipe Israel off the map" are taken very seriously, especially given the historical context of the Holocaust and the Jewish people's vulnerability. Israel's foreign policy is heavily influenced by the need to counter Iranian influence and capabilities. This involves diplomatic efforts to isolate Iran, intelligence operations to disrupt its nuclear program, and military actions against Iranian assets or proxies in neighboring countries, particularly Syria. The ongoing "war between the wars" in Syria, where Israel frequently strikes Iranian and Hezbollah targets, is a direct manifestation of this strategic rivalry.Beyond Borders: The Essence of the Conflict
It's crucial to reiterate that the intensity of this animosity isn't rooted in a traditional border dispute or competition over specific territories. As Colonel Dr. Eran Lerman noted, when asked **"why does Iran hate Israel with such intensity?"** he emphasized, **"It’s not borders—we don’t share one."** This highlights that the conflict is fundamentally ideological and geopolitical. It's about competing visions for the Middle East, a clash of revolutionary Islamic fundamentalism against a Western-aligned, democratic state in a volatile region. It's about Iran's ambition for regional leadership versus Israel's imperative for security and survival. The Palestinian cause, while deeply significant, acts as a powerful catalyst and legitimizing narrative for Iran's broader strategic aims, rather than being the sole origin of the animosity. The question of **how alliances impact the geopolitical climate in the Middle East** is vividly answered by observing the proxy networks Iran has cultivated, which directly challenge Israel's security and regional standing.The Future of Animosity
**Perhaps no one knows how all that hate began in the first place**, in the sense of tracing it back to a single, simple origin. It's a confluence of historical events, ideological shifts, and geopolitical ambitions. **One thing that many people look for is the reason why two particular countries that are thousands of miles apart in terms of distance and caliber so much hate each other.** The answer lies in this complex interplay of factors, solidified over decades. As discussions around a new "Iran deal" periodically emerge, the core motivations behind Iran's stance remain critical to understand. The Iranian leadership's commitment to the "essential nature of the revolution" and its vision of "taking over the world order and destroying Israel in the process" suggests that even a nuclear deal might not fundamentally alter their long-term strategic objectives regarding Israel. The animosity is deeply ingrained, serving both ideological purity and pragmatic geopolitical goals for the regime. The dynamic between Iran and Israel will continue to shape the Middle East. It is a rivalry driven by revolutionary zeal, a quest for regional dominance, and a profound ideological rejection. Understanding these layers is essential for anyone seeking to comprehend the complexities of the modern Middle East and the enduring challenge of **why Iran dislikes Israel** with such unwavering intensity. *** We hope this deep dive has shed light on the complex reasons behind the animosity between Iran and Israel. What are your thoughts on the historical and ideological factors discussed? Do you believe a resolution is possible, or is this conflict destined to continue? Share your insights in the comments below, and don't forget to explore our other articles on Middle Eastern geopolitics for more in-depth analysis.
Why you should start with why
Why Text Question · Free image on Pixabay
UTILITY COMPANIES MAKE MISTAKES - WHY? - Pacific Utility Auditing
