Beyond The Headlines: Do Pakistan And Iran Truly Get Along?
Historical Foundations: First Recognition & Early Ties
The roots of the relationship between Pakistan and Iran run deep, predating the modern geopolitical complexities that often dominate headlines. Their bond was forged at a pivotal moment in history, establishing a precedent of mutual respect and strategic alignment. **Iran and Pakistan established relations on 14 August 1947, the very day of Pakistan's independence.** This was no mere coincidence; Iran held the distinct honor of being the first country to officially recognize the newly formed nation of Pakistan. This early recognition laid a strong foundation for future cooperation and signaled Iran's strategic foresight in acknowledging a significant new player in the Islamic world. This initial gesture was not a fleeting one. The Shah's regime in Iran consistently demonstrated its support for Pakistan during its formative years and beyond. This was particularly evident during times of conflict, where Iran extended tangible assistance. **The Shah’s regime extended military and diplomatic assistance to Pakistan during the 1965 and 1971 wars.** Such support underscored a period where both nations perceived themselves as natural allies, bound by cultural, historical, and religious ties, and sharing a common vision for regional stability and development. This historical camaraderie is a crucial backdrop when we ask, "do Pakistan and Iran get along?" – it shows that the default setting has historically been one of cooperation. For many years, the relationship was characterized by close collaboration on various fronts. Both countries were members of regional pacts like the Baghdad Pact (later CENTO), aimed at countering Soviet influence, further solidifying their strategic alignment. This shared history of early recognition, mutual support, and cooperative frameworks set a high bar for their bilateral relations, creating a legacy that both nations often refer back to, even amidst contemporary challenges.A Shifting Landscape: From Alliance to Discord
While the early decades painted a picture of unwavering alliance, the landscape of Pakistan-Iran relations began to shift following the Iranian Revolution of 1979. The ideological transformation in Iran, coupled with changing regional dynamics, introduced new complexities into the bilateral equation. Pakistan, a predominantly Sunni Muslim nation, found itself navigating the rise of a revolutionary Shi'ite Iran, which sought to export its revolutionary ideals. This ideological divergence, while not immediately leading to overt conflict, certainly introduced a layer of caution and re-evaluation in their diplomatic engagements. Despite these shifts, both countries largely managed to maintain a working relationship, often finding common ground on issues like combating the drug trade and regional security. However, underlying diplomatic issues began to simmer, influenced by a confluence of factors including sectarian concerns, differing approaches to Afghanistan, and the broader geopolitical pressures of the region. **While Iran and Pakistan have had a history of good relationship, the present discord is influenced by several lingering diplomatic issues.** These issues, often subtle and beneath the surface, have the potential to flare up, as seen in recent events. The complexities are further compounded by external influences and regional rivalries. The proxy conflicts in the Middle East, the rise of non-state actors, and the strategic interests of global powers all contribute to a delicate balance that Pakistan and Iran must constantly manage. The question of "do Pakistan and Iran get along" thus becomes less about a simple 'yes' or 'no' and more about navigating a perpetually evolving, multi-faceted relationship.Recent Escalation: The January 2024 Strikes
The early months of 2024 witnessed an unprecedented and alarming escalation in hostilities between Pakistan and Iran, challenging the long-standing narrative of their generally cooperative, albeit complex, relationship. For the first time in their history, these two neighbors conducted direct military strikes on each other's sovereign territories, sending shockwaves across the region and prompting urgent calls for de-escalation. **Pakistan and Iran have both conducted strikes on each other’s territories in an unprecedented escalation of hostilities between the neighbors, at a time when tensions have risen sharply across.** This dramatic turn of events forced the world to re-evaluate how well **do Pakistan and Iran get along**. The sequence of events unfolded rapidly, beginning with an Iranian strike deep inside Pakistani territory, followed by a swift and decisive response from Islamabad.Iran's Strike: Targeting Jaish al-Adl
On January 16, 2024, Iran launched missile and drone strikes targeting what it claimed were bases of the Jaish al-Adl (Army of Justice) terror group in Pakistan's Balochistan province. Jaish al-Adl is a Sunni militant group operating in the border regions of Iran and Pakistan, which Tehran designates as a terrorist organization responsible for attacks within its borders. Iran's stated objective was to neutralize threats emanating from its porous border with Pakistan. This unilateral action by Iran was met with strong condemnation from Islamabad, which viewed it as a blatant violation of its sovereignty and international law. The strike reportedly resulted in civilian casualties within Pakistan, further fueling outrage and demanding a robust response.Pakistan's Response: Operation Marg Bar Sarmachar
Less than 48 hours after Iran's strike, Pakistan retaliated with its own precision military operation. **Pakistan launched a precision attack against Baloch separatists in Iran early on Thursday after an Iranian missile strike on the Jaish al Adl (Army of Justice), a terror group, in Pakistan’s Balochistan province.** Codenamed "Operation Marg Bar Sarmachar" (Death to the Insurgents), Pakistan's strikes targeted hideouts of Baloch separatist groups within Iran's Sistan-Baluchestan province, which Islamabad considers terrorist organizations responsible for attacks inside Pakistan. Pakistan asserted that its strikes were conducted with "extreme care" to avoid civilian casualties and were a legitimate exercise of its right to self-defense against groups that pose a direct threat to its national security. This tit-for-tat exchange marked a dangerous precedent, raising concerns about wider regional instability, especially given the already heightened tensions across the Middle East. However, despite the severity of the strikes, both nations quickly moved to de-escalate. **Pakistan and Iran on Monday agreed to work together to improve security cooperation in the wake of deadly airstrikes by Tehran and Islamabad earlier this month that killed at least 11 people, marking a significant escalation in fraught relations between the neighbors.** This rapid diplomatic engagement, including the visit of the top Iranian diplomat to Islamabad, underscored a mutual desire to prevent further escalation and revert to established channels of communication. **The development came hours after the top Iranian diplomat arrived in Islamabad for talks Monday on deescalating tensions, which flared up after deadly airstrikes by Tehran and Islamabad earlier this month and killed at least 11 people.** This swift de-escalation, after such a dramatic exchange, perhaps offers a nuanced answer to the question, "do Pakistan and Iran get along?" – suggesting that while tensions can boil over, there's a strong underlying imperative to manage the relationship.Beyond the Border: Balochistan and Regional Dynamics
The recent exchange of strikes brought to the forefront a persistent underlying issue in the Pakistan-Iran relationship: the volatile Balochistan region that straddles their shared border. Both countries face challenges from separatist and militant groups operating in this rugged terrain. While Pakistan has long accused Iran of not doing enough to curb the activities of groups like Jaish al-Adl, Iran has similarly pointed fingers at Pakistan regarding Baloch separatist elements. The shared challenge of combating the insurgency in Balochistan is ironically a point of both contention and potential cooperation. **Both countries remain close allies and formed alliances in a number of areas of mutual interest, such as combating the drug trade along their border and the insurgency in Balochistan.** This statement highlights the paradoxical nature of their security concerns in the region. Beyond Balochistan, the broader regional dynamics, particularly concerning Afghanistan, also play a significant role in how well **do Pakistan and Iran get along**. Both Pakistan and Iran share long borders with Afghanistan and have vested interests in its stability and future. However, their approaches and preferred outcomes in Afghanistan have not always aligned. **On the contrary, many Afghan politicians and experts claim that both Iran and Pakistan are working to weaken Afghanistan.** This perception, whether accurate or not, underscores the deep-seated suspicions and competing influences in a highly sensitive geopolitical arena. Iran also exerts influence on various political factions within Afghanistan, including those represented by ethnic Tajiks. This complex web of influence and suspicion adds another layer to the bilateral relationship, making comprehensive cooperation challenging. The shared border, while a source of friction due to militant groups, is also a critical zone for combating illicit activities. The drug trade, originating from Afghanistan, often transits through Balochistan, making cooperation on border security a necessity for both nations. The ability of Pakistan and Iran to effectively manage these cross-border challenges, particularly concerning non-state actors and regional influence, will be a key determinant of the long-term stability and warmth of their relationship.Economic Interdependence: A Path to Stability
Despite the political and security complexities, the economic dimension offers a promising pathway for strengthening the relationship between Pakistan and Iran. Both countries recognize the immense potential for increased trade and economic cooperation, which could serve as a powerful stabilizing force in the region. **Pakistan, despite its economic difficulties, can hold a unique position as a trusted partner for Iran in its economy and trade.** This is particularly true given Iran's long-standing international sanctions, which often limit its trade partners and financial avenues. Pakistan, as a neighbor with a large market and a strategic location, presents a viable option for Iran to expand its economic outreach. The vision of greater economic integration is not new. Projects like the Iran-Pakistan (IP) gas pipeline, though facing various delays and external pressures, symbolize the mutual desire for energy cooperation. Beyond energy, there is potential for increased trade in agricultural products, industrial goods, and services. **The potential for increased economic and trade relations between Iran and Pakistan offers a pathway toward greater regional stability.** By fostering economic interdependence, both nations can create a vested interest in each other's prosperity, thereby reducing the likelihood of conflict and encouraging diplomatic solutions to disputes. However, realizing this potential requires overcoming significant hurdles, including international sanctions on Iran, financing challenges, and bureaucratic inefficiencies. Yet, the strategic imperative remains clear: a robust economic relationship can act as a powerful anchor for the overall bilateral ties, making the question of "do Pakistan and Iran get along" more likely to lean towards cooperation in the long run.Security Cooperation: A Shared Imperative
While the recent exchange of strikes highlighted a breakdown in security coordination, the underlying need for cooperation on security matters remains a shared imperative for Pakistan and Iran. Both nations face common threats from terrorism, cross-border crime, and drug trafficking, making collaborative efforts essential for their respective national security. **Pakistan and Iran have agreed to work together to improve their security cooperation.** This commitment, reaffirmed even after the January 2024 strikes, underscores a recognition that mutual security challenges cannot be effectively addressed in isolation. The border region, particularly Balochistan, is a hotbed for various militant and criminal groups. Combating the drug trade along their border is a crucial area where both countries have historically found common ground. The flow of narcotics from Afghanistan poses a significant challenge to both Iranian and Pakistani societies, necessitating joint intelligence sharing and coordinated operations. Similarly, addressing the insurgency in Balochistan requires a concerted effort to prevent militants from using one country's territory to launch attacks in the other. The swift de-escalation following the January strikes and the subsequent agreement to enhance security cooperation indicate a mature understanding of their shared vulnerabilities. It suggests that despite moments of intense friction, there is a fundamental understanding that their security fates are intertwined. The ability to compartmentalize issues – addressing immediate grievances while maintaining a broader framework for cooperation – is a testament to the pragmatism that often defines how well **do Pakistan and Iran get along**. This pragmatism is vital for managing complex border dynamics and ensuring regional stability.The Nuclear Question and Regional Stability
The broader geopolitical context, particularly concerning nuclear capabilities and regional power dynamics, adds another layer of complexity to the Pakistan-Iran relationship. Pakistan is a declared nuclear power, while Iran's nuclear program continues to be a subject of international scrutiny and concern. The prospect of **a nuclear Iran bordering nuclear Pakistan and allied to nuclear India could trigger a crisis of massive proportions.** This scenario, while hypothetical, highlights the delicate balance of power in South Asia and the Middle East, and the potential for any misstep to have far-reaching consequences. **Iran’s nuclear program is forging ahead,** leading to anxieties among regional and international actors. For Pakistan, a nuclear Iran presents both a challenge and a potential opportunity. On one hand, it could lead to increased regional instability and a nuclear arms race. On the other hand, a nuclear Iran might be seen as a deterrent against external aggression, which could indirectly benefit Pakistan by stabilizing its western flank. However, claims that Pakistan would offer Iran "nuclear cover" or plans to strike Israel if the U.S. intervenes are implausible, given Pakistan’s economic fragility and focus on domestic security. Pakistan's nuclear doctrine is primarily defensive and tailored to its specific security environment. Furthermore, Iran's strategic calculations are heavily influenced by its primary adversary, the United States. **Separately, Iran relies on radar and air defense systems in the case of potential strikes by its main enemy, the United States.** This focus on external threats means Iran's immediate military posture is often directed westward, rather than eastward towards Pakistan. Pakistan, similarly, has its own primary security concerns, often related to its eastern border and internal stability. The perception that **its equipment has long been deployed along that frontier, rather than its border with Iran,** further illustrates that while the recent strikes were alarming, they represent an anomaly rather than a fundamental shift in strategic priorities. The nuclear dimension, therefore, remains a silent but significant factor in how well **do Pakistan and Iran get along**, influencing their strategic calculations and regional posturing.Public Perception and Diplomatic Hurdles
Beyond the high-level diplomatic exchanges and strategic calculations, the question of "do Pakistan and Iran get along" also involves the perceptions of their respective populations and the diplomatic hurdles that persist. Despite the shared Islamic heritage and historical ties, the level of people-to-people interaction between the two nations has not been as robust as with Iran's other neighbors. **Iran and Pakistan (both state and people) has not had a lot of interaction compared to Iran’s other neighbors, That’s why I think there is not much strong feelings any way around.** This observation suggests that while there isn't widespread animosity, there also isn't a deep reservoir of public affection or understanding that might buffer diplomatic tensions. The recent strikes undoubtedly caused **damage to Iran's reputation in Pakistan**. Such actions, especially those resulting in civilian casualties, can quickly erode goodwill and fuel anti-Iranian sentiment among the Pakistani populace. Similarly, Pakistan's retaliatory strikes would have been viewed negatively within Iran, especially among those who perceive Pakistan as an ally or at least a neutral neighbor. These perceptions, shaped by media narratives and political rhetoric, can create a challenging environment for diplomats attempting to mend fences and foster closer ties. Lingering diplomatic issues, often related to border management, sectarian concerns, and differing regional alignments, continue to pose hurdles. Overcoming these requires sustained dialogue, confidence-building measures, and a commitment from both sides to prioritize long-term stability over short-term gains or reactive measures. The ability of leaderships to manage public opinion and articulate a clear vision for cooperation will be crucial in ensuring that the relationship remains on a constructive path.Conclusion: A Relationship Forged in Fire and Friendship
The relationship between Pakistan and Iran is a compelling study in geopolitical complexity, demonstrating that "getting along" in international relations is rarely a simple matter of consistent harmony. From Iran's historic recognition of Pakistan's independence in 1947 and its support during critical wars, to the unprecedented exchange of missile strikes in early 2024, their journey has been marked by both profound cooperation and sharp discord. What emerges is a nuanced picture: while periods of tension and even direct confrontation can arise, there is a strong, underlying imperative for both nations to manage their relationship constructively. Shared challenges like combating drug trafficking and regional insurgencies, coupled with the immense potential for economic cooperation, often compel them back to the negotiating table. The swift de-escalation after the recent strikes, and the immediate agreement to enhance security cooperation, are powerful testaments to this pragmatic approach. Ultimately, the question of "do Pakistan and Iran get along?" cannot be answered with a simple yes or no. Their relationship is a dynamic continuum, influenced by historical bonds, evolving regional realities, internal pressures, and external geopolitical forces. It is a relationship forged in both friendship and the fires of occasional conflict, constantly seeking a balance between shared interests and sovereign concerns. Moving forward, continued dialogue, mutual respect for sovereignty, and a focus on common economic and security goals will be essential for these two pivotal neighbors to navigate the future and ensure regional stability. What are your thoughts on the future of Pakistan-Iran relations? Share your insights in the comments below, and don't forget to explore our other articles on regional geopolitics!
Do Button, Do Camera, and Do Note, A Trio of Incredibly Simple Mobile
"Do" vs. "Does" – What's The Difference? | Thesaurus.com
Using Do vs. Does Properly in Questions and Sentences | YourDictionary
