Unraveling Iran's Conflicts: Who Is Iran Fighting Today?

Cydney Hartmann 19 Jun 2025

The geopolitical landscape of the Middle East is perpetually shifting, marked by intricate alliances and deep-seated animosities. At the heart of many regional tensions lies Iran, a nation that has, for decades, vexed the international community. Understanding who is Iran fighting involves delving into a complex web of historical grievances, ideological clashes, and strategic ambitions that extend far beyond its immediate borders. From direct confrontations to proxy battles, Iran's engagements shape the very fabric of global security.

Iran, a Middle Eastern nation bordered by Turkey and Iraq to the west, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Turkmenistan to the east, the Caspian Sea to the north, and the Persian Gulf to the south, holds a pivotal geographical position. Since it introduced Islam as a form of governance in 1979, the Islamic Republic has consistently challenged international norms, supported militants abroad, and deepened ties with other U.S. adversaries, including China, Russia, and North Korea. This article will explore the multifaceted conflicts Iran is involved in, shedding light on the historical roots and current dynamics of its various confrontations.

The Immediate Front: Iran vs. Israel
Decades of Animosity
Recent Escalations and Air Wars
Iran's Broader Geopolitical Stance
Challenging the United States
Supporting Militants Abroad
Allies and Adversaries: A Complex Web
The Nuclear Program and International Concerns
Regional Influence and Proxy Wars
The Internal Dimension: State Identity and Resistance
Global Reactions and Diplomatic Efforts
The Path Forward: De-escalation or Further Conflict?

The Immediate Front: Iran vs. Israel

Perhaps the most prominent and volatile conflict currently involving Iran is its direct and indirect confrontation with Israel. The conflict between Israel and Iran continues in the Middle East, escalating rapidly in recent times. This is a primary answer to the question of who is Iran fighting on a direct, military level.

Decades of Animosity

The roots of this aggression can be traced back decades, starting from 1979, when the Islamic Republic of Iran was established. The Islamic Republic has long opposed Israel, viewing its existence as an illegitimate occupation of Palestinian lands. Fighting Israel is very much a pillar of state identity in Iran, with the Iranian political establishment set up on the principle of challenging the United States and freeing Palestinian lands. This ideological opposition has fueled a persistent shadow war, occasionally spilling into overt military actions.

Recent Escalations and Air Wars

In recent weeks, the fraught relations between Israel, Iran, and militant group Hezbollah have come to a head. The conflict has continued for several days, with the two Middle East nations having launched an air war over Israel's attack on Iranian nuclear and military sites. A huge explosion rocked Haifa after Tehran launched a new wave of missile attacks, demonstrating Iran’s retained capability to fight back. The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) in a video released on Friday claimed that Iran struck a children’s center in southern Israel, further illustrating the severity of the attacks. In response to these escalations, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stated Israel would be punished for the attack, while President Ebrahim Raisi said it would "not go unanswered," as reported by state news agency IRNA. Israel, for its part, says dozens of people have been injured in fresh attacks by Iran, underscoring the human cost of this ongoing confrontation. Since the October 7, 2023 attacks, Israel has been systematically demolishing structures in Gaza, which further fuels regional tensions and provides context for Iran's anti-Israel stance.

Iran's Broader Geopolitical Stance

Beyond Israel, Iran's foreign policy is defined by its revolutionary ideology and its ambition to project influence across the region. This broader geopolitical stance dictates who is Iran fighting on a more systemic level, often through indirect means.

Challenging the United States

A central tenet of Iran's foreign policy since 1979 has been its opposition to the United States. The Islamic Republic has consistently sought to expel U.S. forces from the Middle East, viewing their presence as an imperialistic intrusion. This ideological battle often manifests in proxy conflicts and rhetorical confrontations. Statements like "Iran and the entire world should know that the US military is the strongest and most lethal fighting force in the world, and we have capabilities that no other country on this planet possesses," made by U.S. officials, highlight the significant military imbalance and the U.S.'s readiness to respond to Iranian provocations. This underlying tension with the U.S. shapes many of Iran's regional actions and alliances.

Supporting Militants Abroad

A key aspect of Iran's strategy is its support for various militant groups across the Middle East. These groups, often referred to as Iran's "Axis of Resistance," include Hezbollah in Lebanon, Houthi rebels in Yemen, and various Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria. By arming, funding, and training these non-state actors, Iran extends its influence and exerts pressure on its adversaries without direct military engagement. This strategy allows Iran to fight proxy wars, challenging the regional order and undermining the interests of its rivals, including Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, as well as the U.S. and Israel.

Allies and Adversaries: A Complex Web

The question of who is Iran fighting also depends on the complex network of alliances and rivalries that define the Middle East. Iran's relationships are often transactional and driven by shared opposition to common enemies.

Rivals: Beyond Israel and the United States, Iran's primary regional adversaries include Saudi Arabia and other Sunni-majority Gulf states. These nations view Iran's revolutionary ideology and its pursuit of regional hegemony as a direct threat to their security and stability. This rivalry often plays out in proxy conflicts in Yemen, Syria, and Iraq.
Allies: Iran has deepened ties with other U.S. adversaries, including China, Russia, and North Korea. These relationships are often strategic, driven by economic interests, military cooperation, and a shared desire to counter U.S. global influence. For instance, Turkey, Russia, and China have voiced their support for Tehran in recent escalations, indicating a complex alignment of interests that defies simple categorization.
Neutral/Concerned Parties: Many European nations, while condemning Iran's actions, also seek diplomatic solutions. For example, the UK, Germany, France, and the EU foreign policy chief meet in a bid to avoid further escalation between Israel and Iran. Switzerland decided to temporarily close its embassy in Tehran because of the fighting between Israel and Iran, with expatriate staff having left Iran and being safe, illustrating the broader international concern over the conflict.

The Nuclear Program and International Concerns

Iran's nuclear program is another major point of contention and a key reason why it faces international scrutiny and potential confrontation. The international community, led by the United States, has long been concerned that Iran's nuclear activities could lead to the development of nuclear weapons, a capability that would dramatically alter the balance of power in the Middle East and beyond.

Negotiations surrounding Iran's nuclear program have been fraught with challenges. President Trump, for instance, once said he would decide whether to attack Iran "within the next two weeks," raising the possibility of revived negotiations on the future of Iran's nuclear program. This highlights the constant tension and the ever-present threat of military action if diplomatic efforts fail. The potential for Iran to acquire nuclear weapons is a significant factor in who is Iran fighting, as it directly challenges the non-proliferation regime and is seen as an existential threat by Israel and a major security concern by the U.S. and its allies.

Regional Influence and Proxy Wars

Iran's ambition to be a dominant regional power often leads it into proxy conflicts. These are indirect confrontations where Iran supports one side in a conflict, while its adversaries support the other. This strategy allows Iran to project power and undermine rivals without engaging in direct, costly military interventions. Examples include:

Yemen: Iran supports the Houthi rebels, who are fighting against a Saudi-led coalition. This conflict is a major humanitarian crisis and a key battleground in the Saudi-Iran rivalry.
Syria: Iran has been a staunch ally of the Assad regime, providing military and financial support, including deploying its own forces and supporting various Shiite militias. This involvement has put Iran at odds with rebel groups, Turkey, Israel (which conducts strikes against Iranian targets in Syria), and, at times, the U.S.
Iraq: Iran maintains significant influence over various Shiite militias and political factions in Iraq, often challenging U.S. interests and contributing to political instability.
Lebanon: Through Hezbollah, Iran exerts considerable influence over Lebanese politics and maintains a powerful armed proxy on Israel's northern border.

These proxy wars are crucial to understanding who is Iran fighting, as they represent the primary mode of its regional power projection and confrontation with its adversaries.

The Internal Dimension: State Identity and Resistance

The question of who is Iran fighting is not solely external; it is deeply intertwined with its internal political identity. The Iranian political establishment is set up on the principle of challenging the United States and freeing Palestinian lands. This anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist stance is not merely a foreign policy choice but a foundational element of the Islamic Republic's legitimacy and state identity. Fighting Israel is very much a pillar of state identity in Iran, serving to unify various factions within the country and to justify the regime's continued existence and its revolutionary ideals. This internal commitment to confrontation means that even if external pressures ease, the ideological drive for resistance remains a powerful force in Iranian policy-making.

Global Reactions and Diplomatic Efforts

The ongoing conflicts involving Iran elicit varied reactions from the international community. As tensions between Israel and Iran escalate, knowing which country is on which side becomes critical. In response to recent attacks, the U.S., UK, France, and Australia have denounced the attack, while Turkey, Russia, and China have voiced their support for Tehran. This division highlights the complex geopolitical alignments at play.

Diplomatic efforts are continuously underway to de-escalate tensions and find peaceful resolutions. Iran, UK, Germany, France, and EU foreign policy chiefs meet in a bid to avoid further escalation between Israel and Iran. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has been speaking to reporters about the conflict and the prospects for ending it, indicating the high-level international engagement aimed at managing the crisis. Despite these efforts, the statements from both sides remain defiant. Both Iran and Israel’s UN ambassadors say that their countries will continue to fight during a tense UN Security Council meeting, underscoring the deep-seated nature of the conflict and the challenges to achieving lasting peace.

The Path Forward: De-escalation or Further Conflict?

The question of who is Iran fighting reveals a nation deeply entrenched in multiple, overlapping conflicts. From its direct, escalating confrontation with Israel to its long-standing ideological battle with the United States and its extensive network of proxy wars across the Middle East, Iran's engagements are complex and far-reaching. The future trajectory of these conflicts remains uncertain. The risk of miscalculation leading to broader regional war is ever-present, especially given the recent direct exchanges between Iran and Israel. Diplomatic efforts, though constant, face significant hurdles due to the deep ideological divides and entrenched strategic interests of all parties involved.

Understanding these dynamics is crucial for anyone seeking to comprehend the volatile nature of Middle Eastern geopolitics. The path forward for Iran and the region will depend on a delicate balance of power, the willingness of all actors to de-escalate, and the effectiveness of international mediation. The world watches closely as these tensions continue to unfold, hoping for a resolution that can bring stability to a region long plagued by conflict.

What are your thoughts on the current state of affairs in the Middle East? Do you believe a diplomatic solution is possible, or is further escalation inevitable? Share your insights in the comments below, and consider exploring our other articles on regional conflicts to deepen your understanding of these critical global issues.

Iran says no to nuclear talks during conflict as UN urges restraint

RealTime Reports

Unraveling Iran's Conflicts: Who Is Iran Fighting Today?

Table of Contents